Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42087453›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging

Association of Acute Ischemic Stroke Volume With Post-Stroke Epilepsy Development.

Vijaya Dasari, Kunio Nakamura, Bhaskar Thoomukuntla, Nicolas Thompson, Shumei Man, Ken Uchino, Andrew Russman, M Shazam Hussain, Vineet Punia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Vijaya DasariEpilepsy Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Kunio NakamuraDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Bhaskar ThoomukuntlaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Nicolas ThompsonDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Shumei ManCerebrovascular Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Ken UchinoCerebrovascular Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Andrew RussmanCerebrovascular Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
M Shazam HussainCerebrovascular Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Vineet PuniaEpilepsy Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeStroke is a leading cause of epilepsy, especially in older adults. The SeLECT score remains the standard among post-stroke epilepsy (PSE) prediction tools. However, its broader validation is limited by the need to manually extract neuroimaging predictors (cortical and middle cerebral artery [MCA] involvement). Unlike the CAVE score, SeLECT did not evaluate acute stroke volume, which can now be quantified automatically. We aimed to determine whether stroke volume independently predicts PSE and compare its predictive contribution to SeLECT's neuroimaging variables.

methodsSeLECT variables were manually extracted. Diffusion-weighted imaging volume was quantified using a validated convolutional neural network. Cox proportional hazards models for time to PSE were built by adding stroke volume (per 10 mL) and then removing cortical and/or MCA involvement. For each model, we analyzed variable significance, discrimination, and calibration.

resultsAmong 221 patients, 35 (15.8%) developed PSE. In our cohort, the original SeLECT score and the refit model had a C-index of 0.669 and 0.642, respectively. Adding stroke volume resulted in a C-index of 0.656. Retaining volume while removing cortical and MCA involvement resulted in C-indices of 0.664 and 0.668, respectively. Keeping stroke volume and removing both variables increased the C-index to 0.679. Calibration was good for all models. Stroke volume in crease by 10 mL was an independent predictor of 12% increased PSE risk across all models.

conclusionsAcute stroke volume is an independent PSE predictor. Stroke volume offered comparable discrimination to the neuroimaging components of the SeLECT score, supporting its use as a scalable and automated alternative.

Indexed as

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingEpilepsyIschemic StrokeStrokeAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of Resultsacute stroke volumeAI toolsdiffusion‐weighted imagingpost‐stroke epilepsyprognostic models

Identifiers

PMID42087453
PMCPMC13145306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.