Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42087408›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2026

Umbrella Sampling Workflows for Fast-Converging PMF Calculations without Artificial WHAM Constraints.

Bjarne Feddersen, Philip C Biggin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bjarne FeddersenStructural Bioinformatics and Computational Biochemistry, Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, OxfordOX1 3QU, U.K.ORCID 0000-0003-4503-3343
Philip C BigginStructural Bioinformatics and Computational Biochemistry, Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, OxfordOX1 3QU, U.K.ORCID 0000-0001-5100-8836

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Umbrella sampling is a powerful tool to investigate the underlying free-energy landscapes that govern the permeation properties of small molecules through complex lipid bilayers. However, obtaining converged potentials of mean force (PMFs) remains an issue due to sampling limitations, and as a result, enhanced sampling approaches are constantly being developed. Here, we benchmark umbrella sampling workflows and test different options for window generation, sampling, and statistical estimation of PMFs against each other to arrive at recommendations to improve PMF convergence speeds and minimize required computational resources. We also report large errors introduced into PMFs by enforcing their symmetry and/or periodicity when sampling is insufficient, leading us to caution against the use of these constraints in future works.

Identifiers

PMID42087408
PMCPMC13217548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.