SynthesisJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2026
Effectiveness and Safety of Interventions for Sarcopenia in Advanced Prostate Carcinoma: Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sarcopenia in breast cancer: prognostic values and emerging therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSarcopenia has emerged as a potential prognostic factor in patients with advanced prostate cancer (PCa), requiring interventions for its prevention and treatment.
objectiveWe aimed to systematically identify, critically assess and synthesize the available evidence on the effectiveness and safety of interventions for preventing or treating sarcopenia in advanced PCa patients.
methodsMEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science were searched. Randomized and non-randomized controlled trials or longitudinal observational studies with a control group focusing on PCa patients aged 60 years and older were considered. Study selection, data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment of the included studies were performed in duplicate. When possible, pooled effect estimates were calculated.
resultsTwenty studies (n = 1275) were included. Resistance training (RT) (MD = 3.22 kg; 95% CI 0.69, 5.75) and the use of antimyostatin peptibody (MD = 2.2 kg; SE 0.8%) demonstrated statistically significant prevention of lean body mass loss in men undergoing androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Exercise improved leg press (MD = 25.17 kg; 95% CI [8.71, 41.62]), leg extension (MD = 9.63 kg; 95% CI [4.83, 14.42]), seated row (MD = 4.38 kg; 95% CI [1.54, 7.22]) and chest press strength (MD = 1.70 kg; 95% CI [-1.48, 4.88]) and enhanced patients' physical functioning in chair sit-to-stand tests (MD = -1.02 kg; 95% CI [-1.70, -0.34]). RT improved health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in both general and specific domains and also reduced somatization (MD = -0.69 kg; 95% CI [-1.32, -0.07]) and psychological distress (MD = -1.63 kg; 95% CI [-3.10, -0.15]).
conclusionsThe findings highlight the potential benefits of RT and selected pharmacological interventions on muscle-related and functional outcomes. However, the significant heterogeneity and lack of comprehensive outcome reporting underscore the need for more standardized and long-term research through larger, well-designed randomized controlled trials with standardized measurement methods to draw conclusive evidence and enhance the reliability and applicability of findings in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.