Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42087327›Full record

ArticleJNCI cancer spectrum2026

Personalized risk prediction of financial toxicity in patients with cancer: an interpretable machine learning study.

Haluk Damgacioglu, Kalyani Sonawane, Gerard A Silvestri, Katherine R Sterba, Elizabeth G Hill, Scott B Cantor, Evan M Graboyes, Ashish A Deshmukh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JNCI cancer spectrum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Haluk DamgaciogluDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4361-4515
Kalyani SonawaneDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5501-3034
Gerard A SilvestriHollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.
Katherine R SterbaDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.
Elizabeth G HillDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.
Scott B CantorDepartment of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Evan M GraboyesDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.
Ashish A DeshmukhDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.

Funding

Optimizing Treatment for Human Papillomavirus-Associated Oropharyngeal Cancer in Older AdultsR01CA290017 · NCI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI Ashish A. Deshmukh, Evan Michael Graboyes · 2025 to 2026
$1.3M
American Cancer Society Institutional Research GR10000835NCI NIH HHS R01 CA290017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFinancial toxicity (FT), the economic stress from medical care, is common among people with cancer and is associated with worse health outcomes. While risk factors for FT are known, personalized FT risk prediction tools to help mitigate FT are lacking.

methodsThis study developed and evaluated machine learning models to predict FT risk using data from the Medical Expenditures Panel Survey-Experiences with Cancer Survivorship Supplement for patients undergoing or within 1 year of cancer treatment. FT was defined as the presence of >1 of the following: bankruptcy, unpaid medical bills, payment concerns, or debt. Several models were trained using demographic, clinical, economic, and social variables. Fine-tuning was performed to enhance sensitivity in predicting FT. The Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) were used for interpretability of the model.

resultsAmong 793 people with cancer, 283 (36%) experienced FT. A fine-tuned random forest algorithm achieved an AUROC of 0.84 (95% CI = 0.78 to 0.91) and an accuracy of 0.78 (95% CI = 0.71 to 0.85), with a sensitivity of 0.84 (95% CI = 0.72 to 0.92) and specificity of 0.75 (95% CI = 0.66 to 0.83), demonstrating balanced classification performance. SHAP values identified key predictors of FT risk, including younger age, lower income, higher medical expenditures, and poorer health status. To support clinical implementation, we developed a web-based FT risk calculator (https://hd-research.shinyapps.io/ftriskcalc/).

conclusionThe fine-tuned random forest algorithm resulted in promising results for predicting personalized FT risk. Integrated into a web-based calculator, the model has strong potential to help mitigate FT by identifying high-risk patients early in the cancer care continuum.

Indexed as

Financial StressHealth ExpendituresMachine LearningNeoplasmsAdultAgedBankruptcyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRandom ForestRisk AssessmentRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID42087327
PMCPMC13235723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.