ArticleImplementation science communications2026
Strengthening implementation of syringe services programs in Florida: insights from a statewide survey and social network analysis.
Article in Implementation science communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSyringe services programs (SSPs) are an evidence-based intervention for preventing infectious diseases and reducing the risk of overdose. Florida passed legislation that authorizes the implementation of SSPs (via the Infectious Disease Elimination Act; IDEA) in 2019. However, little is known about how organizational contexts and interorganizational networks shape adoption, implementation, and sustainment of this intervention.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional, statewide survey of organizations engaged in implementing SSPs and related services between March and May 2025, using a community-based participatory research approach with the Florida Harm Reduction Collective. The survey assessed SSP implementation, barriers and facilitators, implementation climate, organizational sustainability, and interorganizational networks. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-tests for group comparisons, and social network analysis to examine relational structures and organizational centrality.
resultsA total of 29 organizations representing 18 counties responded to the survey. Eight counties reported operating a sanctioned SSP, while none of the remaining counties had ordinances or champions supporting SSP adoption. Stigma and political resistance, lack of funding, and restrictive laws and policies were cited as major barriers to SSP implementation. There was an overall weak implementation climate for SSPs (mean = 1.4 on a 0-4 scale), though it was significantly stronger in counties with operational SSPs (1.8 vs. 1.1, p = 0.01). Organizations reported relatively strong organizational sustainability (mean = 5.6 on a 1-7 scale), with high ratings for program adaptation and lower scores for funding stability. Social network analysis revealed that the Florida Harm Reduction Collective served as the most central and influential node connecting diverse organizations statewide.
conclusionsOur findings highlight both structural barriers (e.g., funding, stigma, restrictive policies) and organizational strengths (e.g., adaptability, network connectivity) in Florida's harm reduction landscape. Addressing policy barriers, expanding and stabilizing funding availability, and leveraging statewide networks will be critical for strengthening implementation of SSPs in Florida and expanding equitable access to harm reduction services for people who use drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.