ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026
Machine learning-based prediction of ventilator therapeutic pressure for optimized CPAP titration.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccurate prediction of therapeutic pressure for Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) therapy is essential for effective treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA). Existing methods often rely on complex sleep-related parameters and small sample sizes, limiting their generalizability. This study aims to develop a more accessible, data-driven model using readily available demographic and physiological variables to predict CPAP pressure, improving both accuracy and scalability.
methodsWe employed a machine learning approach, integrating decision trees, gradient boosting algorithms (LightGBM, XGBoost, CatBoost), and neural networks to predict therapeutic pressure. Forward selection based on the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) was used to identify the most relevant variables. The model was trained on a dataset of 2,092 patients, with model performance assessed using mean absolute error (MAE).
resultsThe most influential variables identified were BMI, neck circumference, and waist-to-hip ratio. Among the algorithms, LightGBM achieved the highest predictive accuracy, with the lowest MAE. Ensemble methods, such as voting, did not improve performance beyond LightGBM alone. Subsample analyses revealed that prediction accuracy varied across BMI ranges and ventilator brands.
conclusionsThe study demonstrates that BMI and other physical parameters play a pivotal role in determining CPAP pressure, offering a simplified yet effective prediction model. This approach has significant potential for clinical applications, particularly in resource-limited settings, where access to complex sleep studies may be restricted. Future research could enhance the model by incorporating real-time physiological data and expanding data collection to diverse populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.