ArticleMalaria journal2026
Effect of cumulative exposure to media channels for malaria messages on knowledge of malaria prevention among women (15-49 years) in Uganda.
Article in Malaria journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMalaria remains a leading global public health concern, disproportionately affecting populations in low-resource settings. Uganda continues to contribute substantially to the global malaria burden, yet exposure to malaria-related health messages remains limited. In recent years, diverse media platforms have been adopted to disseminate prevention messages. This study assessed the influence of cumulative exposure to malaria message media channels on knowledge of malaria prevention and its associated factors among women of reproductive age in Uganda.
methodsWe conducted a secondary analysis of the 2018-2019 Uganda Malaria Indicator Survey (UMIS), comprising 7124 women aged 15-49 years selected using a two-stage cluster and stratified sampling design. Knowledge of four prevention methods recommended by World Health Organization (WHO), bed nets, insecticide-treated nets (ITNs), preventive medicine, and indoor residual spraying (IRS) was assessed. Associations between cumulative media exposure and malaria knowledge were examined using t-tests, margins analysis, and mixed-effects negative binomial regression models.
resultsKnowledge of malaria prevention was unevenly distributed: 76.5% of women reported awareness of bed nets, compared with only 9.1% for ITNs, 6.2% for preventive medicine, and 4.3% for IRS. Cumulative exposure to media channels was significantly associated with knowledge of ITNs (p < 0.001), preventive medicine (p = 0.002), and IRS (p < 0.001), but not bed nets. Education, age, wealth, residence, and region were significant determinants of exposure to media channels. Women with secondary or higher education were nearly twice as likely to report exposure to multiple channels compared to uneducated women (Incidence Rate Ratio, IRR = 1.86; 95% Confidence Interval, CI 1.59-2.17). Similarly, women aged ≥ 40 years were 69% more likely (IRR = 1.69; 95% CI 1.35-2.11) to report exposure to multiple channels than those under 20 years. In contrast, rural and refugee women reported significantly lower exposure relative to urban residents (IRR = 0.77 and 0.28, respectively).
conclusionsCumulative multi-channel exposure to malaria prevention messages significantly improves women's knowledge of ITNs, preventive medicine, and IRS. However, structural inequities in education, wealth, and place of residence limit access to diverse channels. Integrated, context-specific, and equity-focused communication strategies are essential to broaden awareness beyond bed nets and to accelerate progress toward malaria control and elimination in Uganda.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.