Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42087183›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2026

Addition of lactic acid bacteria to diluted ram semen as vehicle for vaginal inoculation: interaction with seminal microbiota, sperm quality and antibacterial in vitro effect against Mycoplasma agalactiae.

Raquel Toledo-Perona, Jesús Gomis, Antonio Sánchez, Marion Toquet, Nerea Bailon-Larrañaga, Esther Bataller, Christian De la Fe, Ángel Gómez-Martín

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Raquel Toledo-PeronaGrupo de investigación Agentes Microbiológicos asociados a la reproducción animal (ProVaginBIO), Departamento Producción y Sanidad Animal, Salud Pública Veterinaria y Ciencia y Tecnología de lo s Alimentos, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, Valencia, 46115, España.
Jesús GomisGrupo de investigación Agentes Microbiológicos asociados a la reproducción animal (ProVaginBIO), Departamento Producción y Sanidad Animal, Salud Pública Veterinaria y Ciencia y Tecnología de lo s Alimentos, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, Valencia, 46115, España. jesus.gomis1@uchceu.es.
Antonio SánchezRuminant Health Research Group, Department of Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Marion ToquetGrupo de investigación Agentes Microbiológicos asociados a la reproducción animal (ProVaginBIO), Departamento Producción y Sanidad Animal, Salud Pública Veterinaria y Ciencia y Tecnología de lo s Alimentos, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, Valencia, 46115, España.
Nerea Bailon-LarrañagaGrupo de investigación Agentes Microbiológicos asociados a la reproducción animal (ProVaginBIO), Departamento Producción y Sanidad Animal, Salud Pública Veterinaria y Ciencia y Tecnología de lo s Alimentos, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, Valencia, 46115, España.
Esther BatallerGrupo de investigación Agentes Microbiológicos asociados a la reproducción animal (ProVaginBIO), Departamento Producción y Sanidad Animal, Salud Pública Veterinaria y Ciencia y Tecnología de lo s Alimentos, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, Valencia, 46115, España.
Christian De la FeRuminant Health Research Group, Department of Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Ángel Gómez-MartínGrupo de investigación Agentes Microbiológicos asociados a la reproducción animal (ProVaginBIO), Departamento Producción y Sanidad Animal, Salud Pública Veterinaria y Ciencia y Tecnología de lo s Alimentos, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, Valencia, 46115, España.

Funding

pre-doctoral contract of the Generalitat Valenciana CIACIF/2021/245Ramón y Cajal" contracts of the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities RYC2021-032245-ISpanish Ministry of Science and Innovation project PID2020-119462RA-I00/AEI/10.13039/501100011033Universidad CEU Cardenal Herrera Consolidation of Research Indicators (INDI25/31)Universidad CEU Cardenal Herrera , España Recognized Research Groups (GIR25/23)Universidad CEU Cardenal Herrera , España Research + Teaching project IDOC22-03 of the CEU-UCH
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) as a probiotic in seminal doses of small ruminants has been suggested due to its antibacterial effects against pathogens such as Mycoplasma agalactiae (Ma) and positive effects on ovine vaginal health. The present in vitro study evaluates the antibacterial effect against Ma of a wild LAB strain from caprine prepuce and a commercial human probiotic (L3) composed by Lactobacillus spp., and evaluates their impact on sperm quality, DNA fragmentation, and the bacterial community composition in the studied conditions. One preputial wild strain (P65) and L3 were tested to assess its antibacterial in vitro potential against Ma in semen doses.

resultsIn experimental conditions with diluted ram semen, the strain P65, identified as Enterococcus hirae, significantly reduced Ma concentration from 7.202 to 0.000 log CFU/mL (p < 0.05), and L3 from 6.872 to 2.699 log CFU/mL (p < 0.001). In addition, experimental condition with P65 suffered a greater Ma inhibition and pH reduction over 15 h of incubation (p < 0.05). In experimental conditions with LAB, sperm motility exceeded 75% in the presence of Ma, with no adverse effects on DNA fragmentation observed. A negative effect on Ma was also observed in diluted semen from rams, which could be attributed to the predominance of several species of Lactobacillus spp. in the semen diluted without antibiotics. Metabarcoding analyse evidence that Actinobacillus, Lactobacillus, and Staphylococcus were naturally present in the diluted semen studied. Moreover, under conditions with diluted semen and the wild strain P65, no significant increase in opportunistic pathogens as Escherichia-Shigella was observed.

conclusionsThis study is the first in vitro report of the antibacterial potential of male reproductive tract LAB against Ma and suggests its ecological importance in the reproductive microbiota of small ruminants. The replacement of antibiotics with species-specific LAB in seminal doses of small ruminants should be evaluated in future in vivo studies.

Indexed as

Mycoplasma agalactiaeMycoplasma InfectionsProbioticsSemenAnimalsDNA FragmentationFemaleGoatsLactobacillusMaleMicrobiotaSemen AnalysisSheepSheep DiseasesSpermatozoaSperm Motility16S rRNACaprineEnterococcusEscherichia-ShigellaLactobacillusMetabarcodingOvineProbioticSemen quality

Identifiers

PMID42087183
PMCPMC13317260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.