ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026
An intelligent auxiliary diagnostic system for early osteoporosis screening using stacking ensemble learning.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOsteoporosis is a common chronic condition in older adults, characterized by reduced bone mineral density and increased fracture risk. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry is the diagnostic gold standard, but its cost and limited availability restrict large-scale screening in primary and community care. There is a need for auxiliary diagnostic systems that use routinely collected clinical data to identify individuals at high risk of osteoporosis.
methodsData from the 2017–2020 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were analysed. Adults aged 50 years or older with valid dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements at the femoral neck or lumbar spine were included. Osteoporosis was defined by a T-score of − 2.5 or lower at either site. After structured preprocessing and imputation, a penalised logistic regression method was used for feature selection. A two-level stacking ensemble learning was then constructed, combining five base learners (logistic regression, decision tree, gradient boosting, extreme gradient boosting and multilayer perceptron) with logistic regression as the meta-learner. Models were trained with stratified five-fold cross-validation in the training set, and performance was assessed in an independent test set.
resultsA total of 3,735 participants were included, of whom 390 had osteoporosis. Participants with osteoporosis were older and had lower body mass index, hip circumference and serum uric acid levels than those without osteoporosis. Feature importance analysis indicated that age, sex, body mass index and uric acid were the most influential predictors. In the test set, the stacking ensemble achieved an accuracy of 0.96, an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.95, a precision of 0.83, a recall of 0.81 and an F1-score of 0.82, outperforming all individual base models and maintaining a low false-positive rate.
conclusionsA stacking ensemble learning based on routinely available clinical and laboratory variables provided robust discrimination of osteoporosis risk under real-world class imbalance. This approach may serve as a practical, low-cost auxiliary diagnostic tool to support targeted dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry referral in primary and community care. External and prospective validation in diverse populations is needed before widespread clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.