Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42087162›Full record

Trial reportBMC oral health2026

The deviation between the planned and actual positions of immediate implants placed in the anterior maxilla using the virtual safe angle concept and a novel computer-guided drilling protocol: A prospective clinical trial.

Ahmed Ibrahim Aboul Fettouh, Ahmed Fouad, Khaled Keraa, Rafik Nasser, Nael Adel, Ingy Kastour, Inas El-Zayat

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05750004 (The Deviation Between the Planned and Actual Positions of Immediate Implants Placed in the Anterior Maxilla Using the Virtual Safe Angle Concept and a Novel Computer-guided Drilling Protocol. A Prospective Clinical Trial), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05750004 nacompletednot on this map

The Deviation Between the Planned and Actual Positions of Immediate Implants Placed in the Anterior Maxilla Using the Virtual Safe Angle Concept and a Novel Computer-guided Drilling Protocol. A Prospective Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAhmed Abo El FuttouhRan2023 to 2024Enrolled26ConditionsImmediate ImplantsArmscomputer guided immediate implant placement
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ahmed Ibrahim Aboul FettouhFaculty of Dentistry, Misr International University, Cairo, Egypt.
Ahmed FouadPrivate Practice, Facility Dental Lab, Cairo, Egypt.
Khaled KeraaBiostatistician and Quality Management specialist, Faculty of Dentistry, Misr International University, Cairo, Egypt.
Rafik NasserClinical Researcher, International Dental Contiuing Education and Research Institute (IDCE), Cairo, Egypt.
Nael AdelClinical Researcher, International Dental Contiuing Education and Research Institute (IDCE), Cairo, Egypt.
Ingy KastourClinical Researcher, International Dental Contiuing Education and Research Institute (IDCE), Cairo, Egypt.
Inas El-ZayatOperative Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Misr International University, Cairo, Egypt. inas.zayat@miuegypt.edu.eg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnatomical complexities and socket configuration in anterior maxilla often results in challenging immediate implant placement, where implants tend to be facially positioned. Implants with facially placed shoulders exhibited three times more midfacial recession. Despite using surgical guides, osteotomy drills tend to follow the least resistance path dictated by socket anatomy. This prospective clinical trial aimed to measure the deviation from the planned implant position during immediate implant placement in the anterior maxilla and its impact on esthetic outcomes, utilizing a new computer-guided plateau drilling protocol.

methodsTwenty-six patients (7 males and 19 females, ages 20-42) with non-restorable maxillary anterior teeth participated in this study. Virtual planning was done using the Safe Angle Concept and the implants were placed with a partially guided approach. Standard tessellation language files obtained from scanned casts and initial computed tomography scans were used to plan the virtual position of the implants and surgical guides fabrication. Angular, global platform and global apex deviations from the planned implant position were measured after three-months. Bone formed labial to the implant and pink esthetic score were assessed after nine-months.

resultsThe current investigation showed that the use of the new computer-guided plateau drilling protocol resulted in clinically acceptable ranges of angular, global platform, and global apex deviation 4.56 ± 3.14°, 0.91 ± 0.61 mm, 1.47 ± 0.88 mm respectively. Radiographic analysis revealed mean mm amount of bone formed labial to the implant of 2.13 ± 0.99 mm and pink esthetic score displayed a mean of 11.89 ± 1.75, with a median of 12.5 after nine months.

conclusionsThe virtual safe angle planning concept combined with plateau drilling protocol showed promising accuracy in immediate implant placement in the anterior maxilla. The resultant deviation had no influence on the esthetic outcomes. The current trial was registered at Clinical trials.gov (ID: NCT05750004, Date: 19-February-2023).

Indexed as

Dental Implantation, EndosseousImmediate Dental Implant LoadingMaxillaSurgery, Computer-AssistedAdultEsthetics, DentalFemaleHumansMalePatient Care PlanningProspective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedYoung AdultEsthetic zoneGuided implant surgeryImmediate implantImplant deviationSafe angle concept

Identifiers

PMID42087162
PMCPMC13159268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.