ArticleBMC medical education2026
Critical incidents experienced by medicine interns in pandemics: a qualitative study at a South American medical school.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCritical Incidents (CI) during clinical practice offer valuable insights into medical students' experiences of stress, gaps in the teaching process, psychological safety, and systemic issues within healthcare. This study explored the elements that students identified as CIs during their clinical internships during the COVID-19 pandemic in Chile.
methodsThis qualitative study involved voluntary participation from 24 final-year medical interns. Researchers collected data through documentary analysis of CI narratives from learning portfolios and two focus groups. The research team performed a reflexive thematic analysis.
resultsAnalysis yielded 22 definitive codes, grouped into nine subthemes and three themes: types of CIs, influencing factors, and personal impact on interns. Most CIs were unrelated to COVID-19 itself and triggered by complex biopsychosocial cases involving ethical dilemmas, questionable or unacceptable behaviors of healthcare personnel, and emotionally charged situations. Some CI related to the human relationship between interns and supervisors, between the health team, or in communication with patients and their families. Interns' reflections focused on their professional role, ethics, communication, and self-care. Most adaptations described were self-directed due to limited faculty involvement. DISCUSSION: CI analysis allows interns to reflect on their roles and envision improvements for future practice. The primary emotions associated with CI were predominantly negative, and their adaptations were self-directed. One important topic to address is whether faculty are available and prepared to support interns, or whether they may themselves be contributors to CIs. These findings suggest the need for structured faculty support to improve psychological safety and reflective learning during internships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.