ArticleBMC medical imaging2026
Prediction of tumor regression grading in rectal cancer neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a habitat radiomics analysis of imaging biomarker.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTumor regression grading (TRG) is a core prognostic predictor of treatment outcomes in rectal cancer. Conventional TRG assessment methods are limited in capturing the full complexity of intratumoral heterogeneity. Advances in medical imaging, particularly radiomics and habitat-based analysis, hold promise the improve TRG prediction by quantitatively characterizing subregional tumor features. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of habitat radiomics in preoperatively predicting TRG in rectal cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT).
methodsComputed tomography (CT) images were analyzed to compare the predictive performance of conventional radiomics features and habitat-based analysis. Tumor regions of interest (ROIs) were segmented, extracting local imaging features. Voxel-level clustering was employed to identify distinct intratumoral subregions. Machine learning algorithms, including ExtraTrees, support vector machine (SVM), and Random Forest, were applied to predict TRG.
resultsFor the conventional radiomics model, the ExtraTrees algorithm yielded superior performance, with AUCs of 0.912 and 0.817 in training and testing cohorts, respectively, outperforming SVM and Random Forest. The habitat model outperformed conventional radiomics model, while the combined model integrating habitat features and clinical variables yielded the optimal efficacy (training AUC = 0.916, test AUC = 0.833). In the binary classification task of TRG0 (pathologic complete response, pCR) vs. TRG1-2, the Habitat model achieved a test AUC of 0.884, and the combined model further reached 0.929. SHAP analysis identified that features from the H1 subregion and wavelet-transformed features were the top predictive contributors.
conclusionHabitat-based radiomics, especially when integrated with clinical data, significantly improves the preoperative prediction of TRG in rectal cancer patients undergoing nCRT, providing a powerful tool to advance personalized oncology. Further validation in large-scale, multicenter, independent cohorts is warranted to facilitate the clinical translation of this approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.