ArticleBMC geriatrics2026
Delirium in German Nursing Homes - a qualitative study of care practice from the perspective of nurses and general practitioners.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDelirium is a multifactorial and potentially life-threatening syndrome that remains underdiagnosed and undertreated in nursing homes, despite residents' high vulnerability due to advanced age, multimorbidity and cognitive impairment. To date, little is known how healthcare professionals perceive and manage delirium in these settings, particularly regarding prevention, diagnosis, therapy and interdisciplinary collaboration, as well as differentiation from other neurodegenerative diseases. This study explores the perspectives of nurses and general practitioners (GPs) on the quality of delirium care in German nursing homes in order to identify barriers and opportunities for improvement.
methodsAn exploratory qualitative design was employed. A total of 30 semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 nurses and 15 GPs in Germany. Participants were recruited using a criterion-based purposive sampling strategy to ensure their direct involvement in nursing home care. Data were collected using collaboratively developed interview guides and analyzed using qualitative content analysis with a deductive-inductive approach.
resultsBoth nurses and GPs reported uncertainty and variability in the understanding, recognition and management of delirium in nursing homes. While preventive and other non-pharmacological measures were applied intuitively, they were rarely identified as delirium-specific. Both professions highlighted limited knowledge and training, unclear responsibilities and the absence of standardized tools as major barriers to effective care. Diagnostic practices were largely based on clinical impression rather than structured assessments. Interprofessional and interdisciplinary cooperation was considered essential but was often hindered by organizational factors and individual attitudes. Participants also emphasized the value of involving relatives and other significant others in the care process but noted that this was inconsistent.
conclusionDelirium care in German nursing homes is non-standardized and marked by substantial variability in practice and outcomes. Although individual nurses and GPs recognize the challenges and apply some effective routines intuitively, care remains insufficiently systematic and rarely guided by standardized strategies in general. Addressing knowledge gaps, improving interprofessional communication and implementing structured care pathways are crucial steps toward enhancing the prevention, diagnosis and therapy of delirium in these settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.