Trial reportBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026
Vitamin D deficiency and supplementation in pregnancy: a clinical trial using an irregular fuzzy cellular automata model.
Trial report in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPregnant women need enough vitamin D for healthy pregnancies, but many women in Iran's Khuzestan province don't get sufficient sunlight to produce vitamin D naturally. In this study, we aimed to determine how many pregnant women have low vitamin D levels and to test different methods of providing vitamin D supplements. We also sought to assess whether our new algorithm model, called Irregular Fuzzy Cellular Automata (IFCA), performs better than older methods for predicting pregnancy complications.
methodsWe examined 2,481 pregnant women who participated in this study in two Iranian cities between 2014 and 2016. Women with vitamin D blood levels below 20 ng/mL were considered to have low vitamin D. We selected 800 women with moderate or severe vitamin D deficiency (25(OH)D < 50 nmol/L) and assigned them to eight groups receiving different combinations of injectable and oral supplementation regimens. We assessed maternal complications such as gestational hypertension, diabetes, preterm birth, and premature rupture of membranes. For babies, we evaluated their weight, length, head size, and vitamin D levels in their cord blood. We compared how well our new IFCA model worked against older methods by evaluating its accuracy compared to them.
resultsOur results indicate that 85% of the women had low vitamin D levels, with approximately 38% exhibiting severe deficiency. After taking supplements, the average vitamin D level in mothers went up to 24.1 ± 3.2 ng/mL (p < 0.001). Mothers' vitamin D levels matched closely with their babies' levels (r = 0.82, p < 0.001). Only 0.6% of women developed high blood pressure during pregnancy, but we found that being overweight and having high blood pressure were bigger problems (OR = 2.3, p = 0.032) than low vitamin D alone. Our IFCA model worked better than older methods, achieving an accuracy of 89% with an AUC of 0.92 (p < 0.01).
conclusionLow vitamin D is very common in pregnant women who don't get much sunlight, but providing them with supplements can address this issue. Both injection and pill forms of vitamin D helped bring levels back to normal. Our new IFCA model was better at finding women who might have pregnancy problems than older methods. Doctors should monitor vitamin D levels early in pregnancy and utilize improved tools to help ensure the health of mothers and babies.
trial registrationThis study was registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) under the code IRCT2014102519660N1. Registered on 15 January 2014 at www.irct.ir .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.