Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42086998›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

Subclinical auditory effects of recreational diving: a multidimensional audiological assessment beyond the audiogram.

Ahsen Kartal Özcan, Betül Yazar, Şahika Özer, Fatma Dutak, Kübra Aytaç, Ayşe Aslı Yılmaz Şahin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ahsen Kartal ÖzcanDepartment of Audiology, Hamidiye Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Health Sciences, Tıbbiye Cad. No:38, Istanbul, Türkiye. ahsen.kartal@sbu.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2462-7583
Betül YazarDepartment of Audiology, Hamidiye Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Health Sciences, Tıbbiye Cad. No:38, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-8094-3769
Şahika ÖzerDepartment of Audiology, Hamidiye Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Health Sciences, Tıbbiye Cad. No:38, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-7025-8524
Fatma DutakDepartment of Audiology, Hamidiye Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Health Sciences, Tıbbiye Cad. No:38, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-1434-4102
Kübra AytaçDepartment of Audiology, Hamidiye Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Health Sciences, Tıbbiye Cad. No:38, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-4473-913X
Ayşe Aslı Yılmaz ŞahinDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Health Sciences, Ümraniye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7846-9453

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to evaluate peripheral auditory function and Eustachian tube function in individuals engaged in recreational diving compared with non-diving controls, via a multidimensional audiological assessment approach.

methodsA total of 49 participants aged 18-50 years were included, comprising 24 individuals actively engaged in scuba or free diving who reported no auditory or neurotological complaints prior to initiating diving, and 25 non-diving controls without any otologic or neurologic disorders. All participants underwent otorhinolaryngologic examination, conventional and wideband tympanometry, Eustachian tube function (ETF) testing, pure-tone audiometry, and distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) measurements. The subjective ETF was assessed via the Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire-7 (ETDQ-7).

resultsPure-tone audiometry, speech audiometry, and conventional tympanometric measurements were not significantly different between the groups (all p > 0.05). In the diver group, the middle ear resonance frequency was significantly lower in at least one ear than in the control group (p < 0.05). Objective ETF testing revealed a higher frequency of Eustachian tube dysfunction in diver group (p < 0.05), and ETDQ-7 scores were also significantly higher in this group (p < 0.05). Additionally, DPOAE measurements revealed significant group differences at higher frequencies, with reduced amplitudes observed in divers (p < 0.05).

conclusionRecreational diving may be associated with subclinical alterations in middle ear mechanics, Eustachian tube function, and cochlear outer hair cell activity that are not detected by standard audiometric evaluations. The inclusion of wideband tympanometry, objective ETF testing, and high-frequency DPOAE measurements may provide complementary information for audiological evaluation of individuals engaged in recreational diving.

Indexed as

DivingEustachian TubeOtoacoustic Emissions, SpontaneousAcoustic Impedance TestsAdolescentAdultAudiometry, Pure-ToneAuditory AcuityCase-Control StudiesDiving and Hyperbaric MedicineFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultDistortion product otoacoustic emissionsEustachian tube functionMiddle ear resonance frequencyRecreational divingWideband tympanometry

Identifiers

PMID42086998
PMCPMC13388512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.