ReviewEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026
Prestin as a potential biomarker for cochlear injury: Current evidence and future directions.
Review in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assay platform non-comparability as a foundational constraint on the synthesis of prestin evidence in cochlear biomarker research.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposePrestin has been identified as a potential biomarker for cochlear damage and consequent ototoxicity. Although several preclinical and clinical studies have investigated prestin, a comprehensive overview of the evidence regarding its diagnostic value across different types of auditory damage and its use for cancer treatment-related ototoxicity is currently lacking.
methodsA structured literature review, based on a systematic PubMed search, was conducted to summarize preclinical and clinical studies that evaluated serum and/or plasma prestin levels in association with cochlear damage. Studies were categorized by etiology, moment of biomarker assessment, and correlation with functional hearing outcomes.
resultsTwenty-one studies (six animal, 15 human) were included. In animal models, prestin levels increased within hours to days after cochlear injury. Clinical studies showed elevated prestin levels within 30 days after acute damage, due to cisplatin exposure, noise exposure, or surgery. Higher prestin levels correlated with elevated hearing thresholds in six studies, whereas findings were more variable in age-related or chronic hearing loss. So far, no pediatric populations have been studied, and reference values or diagnostic thresholds for prestin are lacking.
conclusionPrestin shows potential for use as a biomarker for acute cochlear damage, with time-dependent patterns observed in both animal and human studies. However, heterogeneity in study design, patient populations, and measurement methods limits current general conclusions and recommendations for its use in the clinical field. Further standardized and longitudinal studies, including pediatric and cancer-survivor cohorts, are needed to determine its clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.