ReviewNature reviews. Rheumatology2026
Sex and gender differences in rheumatology: clinical impact and future directions.
Review in Nature reviews. Rheumatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sex and gender shape disease presentation, diagnostic accuracy, treatment response and clinical outcomes in rheumatology, yet these dimensions remain insufficiently embedded in clinical practice. Owing to the markedly unbalanced sex prevalence ratios across many rheumatic diseases, the 'minority' sex is consistently under-represented in clinical studies, limiting the interpretation of long-term outcomes and treatment effectiveness. Sex-related differences in pain perception, inflammatory biomarkers and imaging patterns further complicate disease assessment, and treatment allocation and drug persistence also differ between women and men. Gender-related factors - including disparities in care-seeking behaviours, social roles and lifestyle factors - additionally modulate symptom burden and disease trajectories. Evidence remains particularly scarce for transgender, gender-diverse and intersex individuals, who are rarely captured in clinical cohorts, restricting the development of inclusive and generalizable evidence. Embedding sex-aware and gender-aware approaches into diagnostic reasoning, risk assessment and therapeutic decision-making is therefore essential for advancing precision, equity and truly personalized rheumatological care. Such integration enables clinicians to interpret disease signals more accurately, anticipate divergent multimorbidity trajectories and tailor treatment strategies to the biological and sociocultural contexts of each patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42086965What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.