ArticleInternational journal of behavioral medicine2026
Supplementing Disease Risk Information for Type 2 Diabetes and Coronary Heart Disease with Polygenic Risk Scores: Testing a Health Action Process Approach-Inspired Path Model to Predict Health Behavior.
Article in International journal of behavioral medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdvances in genotyping have heightened interest in using polygenic risk scores (PRS) to predict complex diseases such as type 2 diabetes (T2D) and coronary heart disease (CHD). However, the psychological effects of receiving a PRS have been examined only to a limited extent, with a notable absence of studies grounded in health psychology theory. The present study investigated whether incorporating PRS into risk communication influences health behaviors, drawing on a model inspired by the Health Action Process Approach (HAPA).
methodThe sample was collected in a randomized experimental design (N = 1494), in which 751 participants received a PRS result and 743 did not. Multigroup structural equation modeling was used to estimate HAPA-inspired path models and test whether the path coefficients differed between the study groups. The models examined how perceived risk, self-efficacy, and outcome expectancies were related to intentions to increase physical activity (PA) and fruit and vegetable intake (FVI), and how these intentions, in turn, were related to subsequent behavior.
resultsMultigroup analysis revealed small, non-significant differences between groups, suggesting that the inclusion of PRS did not substantially alter the functioning of the motivational pathways proposed by HAPA or the resulting health behaviors.
conclusionSupplementing traditional disease risk information with PRS does not appear to significantly disrupt the motivational processes typically associated with health behavior change. These findings align with prior research on the HAPA model as well as with studies examining the psychological impact of receiving PRS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42086962What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.