Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42086958›Full record

ArticleAAPS PharmSciTech2026

Understanding the Influence of Molarity, Buffer Capacity, and pH on Product-specific Guidance Dissolution Method for Developing a Discriminatory Dissolution Method for the Development of Mesalamine Products.

Ankit Kumar, Sakshi Kunjir, Prakash Kumar Sirvi, Ayush Rohila, Sadhana Dhyagala, Rajkumar Malayandi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ankit KumarDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Export Promotion Industrial Park (EPIP), National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Hajipur, Zandaha Road, NH322, Hajipur, Bihar, 844102, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-0603-1492
Sakshi KunjirDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Export Promotion Industrial Park (EPIP), National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Hajipur, Zandaha Road, NH322, Hajipur, Bihar, 844102, India.
Prakash Kumar SirviDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Export Promotion Industrial Park (EPIP), National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Hajipur, Zandaha Road, NH322, Hajipur, Bihar, 844102, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-4148-171X
Ayush RohilaDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Export Promotion Industrial Park (EPIP), National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Hajipur, Zandaha Road, NH322, Hajipur, Bihar, 844102, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-9362-8365
Sadhana DhyagalaDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Export Promotion Industrial Park (EPIP), National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Hajipur, Zandaha Road, NH322, Hajipur, Bihar, 844102, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1834-7750
Rajkumar MalayandiDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Export Promotion Industrial Park (EPIP), National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Hajipur, Zandaha Road, NH322, Hajipur, Bihar, 844102, India. rajkumar.ceutics@niperhajipur.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1435-6115

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Achieving therapeutic intraluminal Mesalamine (MES) concentration at colonic lesion sites is influenced by variable gastrointestinal (GI) pH, buffer capacity (β), fluid volume, viscosity, and transit time. Conventional dissolution tests often overpredict in vivo performance, limiting their relevance for pharmacokinetic prediction. The present study focuses on understanding the impact of pH, molarities, and β on the dissolution behaviour of the MES products and generics. This study evaluates the effect of dissolution media on Prolonged-release granules (PRGs) and Multi-Matrix (MMX®) tablets, and their generics, using product-specific guidance (PSG) protocols across dissolution media and buffer strengths (25, 50, and 160 mM). PRGs showed slower release in low molarity media. It was observed that there was no β effect on the drug release profile in acetate media, where MES remains a poorly soluble zwitterion at pH 4.3. MMX® tablets were sensitive to buffer molarity; 25 mM phosphate buffer caused slower release, revealing differences that were masked under high-molarity Quality Control (QC) media. In 160 mM phosphate buffer, MMX® generics were similar to the reference, but did not meet the f₂ criteria in 25 mM buffer, demonstrating the discriminatory power of low-β media. Overall, molarity, β and pH critically influence MES release, suggesting that different dissolution methods for MES formulations with respect to their discriminatory power should be a valuable tool to mitigate bioequivalence failures in generic development.

Indexed as

MesalamineBuffersChemistry, PharmaceuticalDelayed-Action PreparationsDrug LiberationDrugs, GenericHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationSolubilityTabletsViscosityBuffersDelayed-Action PreparationsDrugs, GenericMesalamineTabletsbiorelevant releasebuffer capacityinflammatory bowel diseasemesalamineprolonged release granules

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.