Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42086933›Full record

ReviewLeukemia2026

Smoldering multiple myeloma in transition: redefining early myeloma in the modern era.

Ola Landgren

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Leukemia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ola LandgrenSylvester Myeloma Institute, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA. col15@miami.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6485-4839

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) has long been viewed as an intermediate precursor state, monitored until symptoms or organ dysfunction signaled the transition to active multiple myeloma (MM). Over the past decade, however, major advances in molecular biology, modern imaging, and immunotherapy have reshaped our understanding of early plasma cell disorders. The recent FDA approval of daratumumab for high-risk SMM marks a historic turning point. For the first time, early intervention is not only feasible but clinically validated. This evolving framework challenges long-standing assumptions regarding diagnostic boundaries, risk stratification, and the traditional "watch-and-wait" paradigm. It is logical to conjecture that emerging and future technologies will redefine portions of today's SMM population as early myeloma, while others may ultimately be reclassified as benign monoclonal gammopathies. An interesting question is whether there will be any SMM patients left? This article reviews how the field has arrived at this new therapeutic era, outlines its limitations, and highlights key scientific and clinical questions that will shape the next generation of SMM research and care.

Indexed as

Multiple MyelomaSmoldering Multiple MyelomaHumans

Identifiers

PMID42086933
PMCPMC13233296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.