ReviewSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026
Spirituality and religiosity in cancer care: A targeted review of the NCCN distress thermometer and implications for holistic screening.
Review in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSpiritual and religious concerns are an integral yet often overlooked component of distress in cancer care. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Distress Thermometer (DT) includes a "spiritual/religious concerns" item on its Problem List, but little is known about how this item is used or how it informs clinical care.
methodsThis targeted review examined how spiritual distress is identified and addressed using the DT in oncology settings. A PubMed search yielded 44 articles; six met inclusion criteria. Most studies were cross-sectional, conducted outside the United States, and varied widely in design, populations, and measurement tools.
resultsFindings suggest that spiritual/religious concerns are endorsed by a meaningful subset of patients-especially during active treatment or at critical points such as diagnosis or recurrence-and often coincide with high distress scores. However, prevalence rates varied significantly (5%-60%), and few studies evaluated whether positive screens led to referrals or meaningful spiritual support. Only two studies used validated measures of spiritual well-being alongside the DT, and some findings-such as unexpectedly strong correlations between spiritual well-being and anxiety/depression-warrant further investigation.
conclusionDespite its inclusion in a widely used screening tool, the spiritual/religious concerns item remains underutilized and poorly understood. This review identifies major gaps in understanding when and how spiritual concerns arise, what influences their reporting, and how needs are addressed in practice. In the United States, where the DT is routinely collected, these gaps present a clear opportunity for targeted research and implementation efforts to improve holistic, values-aligned cancer care through better spiritual support integration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42086925What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.