ArticlePharmaceutical research2026
PK-PD Modeling Suggests Tumor Heterogeneity Limits Preclinical to Clinical Translation of Enzalutamide in Prostate Cancer.
Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess the translational performance of preclinical models to anticipate enzalutamide clinical efficacy in prostate cancer using a cross-species physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK)-pharmacodynamic (PD) model and published enzalutamide preclinical and clinical PK-PD data.
methodsA mouse PBPK model was developed and linked to a tumor growth inhibition (TGI) model to describe tumor volume profiles in 5 cell line-derived and 3 patient-derived xenografts. Estimated preclinical PD model parameters were fixed to simulate clinical progression free survival (PFS) using a scaled-up human PBPK model and a calculated prostate cancer tumor growth rate. Tumor static concentrations (TSCs) were calculated and assessed relative to predicted steady-state concentrations from a standard dosing regimen.
resultsEstimated mouse model parameters were precise (CV% < 15% and 45% for most PK and PD parameters), and the estimated hepatic intrinsic clearance was comparable to conventional allometry (allometric exponent = 0.722). The 8 TSC values were near or below the simulated steady-state plasma drug concentration (18,000 ng/mL) achieved with a standard enzalutamide regimen (TSC range 203-20,740 ng/mL). The TGI model failed to predict clinical PFS unless a tumor heterogeneity model with sensitive and resistant tumor cell populations and individually calibrated growth rates were explicitly incorporated.
conclusionsThe potential and the limitations of using preclinical PD parameters for clinical translation were assessed, and more biologically accurate TGI models are needed to enhance the use of translational modeling in oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42086870What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.