ArticleNpj mental health research2026
Smartphone gaze-tracking for accessible psychiatric assessment.
Article in Npj mental health research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Eye movements are promising biomarkers for psychiatric and neurological disorders, yet conventional recording methods rely on bulky, expensive, and laboratory-bound devices. Deep-learning-based gaze-tracking technology now provides a practical means to capture these biomarkers outside the lab, with consumer-grade smartphones offering a particularly scalable platform. To evaluate the feasibility of this approach for psychiatric assessment, we conducted two complementary studies: a clinical investigation of hospitalized patients with schizophrenia and a normative study of healthy college students. In Study 1, we collected gaze data from individuals with clinically diagnosed schizophrenia (N = 134) and matched healthy controls (N = 130) using both an iPhone and a research-grade EyeLink eye-tracker. In Study 2, we used smartphone gaze-tracking data from a university cohort (N = 631) to classify depressive symptoms. Results demonstrated that smartphone-derived gaze metrics can distinguish psychiatric conditions. For schizophrenia detection, the smartphone model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 87.00% and an accuracy of 83.33%, comparable to the EyeLink benchmark (AUC = 87.12%; accuracy = 86.67%). For classifying depressive symptoms, a free-viewing task on Android smartphones yielded an AUC of 75.54% and an accuracy of 75.79%. These findings highlight the potential of smartphone gaze-tracking as an accessible, privacy-preserving tool for real-world psychiatric assessment and treatment monitoring.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.