Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42086851›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2026

A highly sensitive famous face recognition paradigm for prosopagnosia screening.

Sarah Bate, Emma Portch, Olivia Dark, Rachel Bennetts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah BateDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Bournemouth University, BH12 5BB, Poole, UK. sbate@bournemouth.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5484-8195
Emma PortchDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Bournemouth University, BH12 5BB, Poole, UK.
Olivia DarkDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Bournemouth University, BH12 5BB, Poole, UK.
Rachel BennettsDepartment of Psychology, Brunel University London, London, UK.

Funding

Leverhulme Trust RF-2020-105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Famous face recognition tasks have traditionally been used to diagnose prosopagnosia, offering striking examples of the inability to recognise highly familiar faces. Yet, their popularity has dwindled with the development of standardised unfamiliar face recognition tasks that are less cumbersome to administer and can readily be implemented online. Here, we argue that there is a danger of omitting measures of familiar face recognition from prosopagnosia screening: not only may this challenge the very definition of the condition, but, with some adjustments, famous face recognition tasks can continue to offer highly sensitive measures of everyday face recognition ability. Thus, we developed and evaluated an online, automated famous face recognition paradigm that can readily be implemented into large-scale screening programmes. This task improves on previous designs by (a) eliminating extrinsic cues to identity by including distractor as well as familiar faces, (b) supporting the use of unseen rather than "iconic" images of celebrities, and (c) offering a method for automated scoring. Multiple versions of the task were found to have high sensitivity in the detection of developmental prosopagnosia. When required, sub-scores collected from the same paradigm can be used to assess performance at different stages of recognition and identification, helping to probe more precise loci of impairment. The latter is important to guide the diagnosis of more complex cases and, potentially, their remediation.

Indexed as

Facial RecognitionProsopagnosiaRecognition, PsychologyAdultFaceFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPattern Recognition, VisualYoung AdultFace perceptionFace recognitionIdentificationProsopagnosiaSemantics

Identifiers

PMID42086851
PMCPMC13144195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.