ReviewNPJ precision oncology2026
AI and network biology for rational polypharmacology in signaling drug design: a review.
Review in NPJ precision oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The complexity of disease-causing signaling networks is indicative of the failure of single-target therapeutics to work, particularly because of feedback, redundancy and activation of compensatory responses. The review describes the recent movement to network pharmacology and purposeful polypharmacology facilitated by the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) and massive biological knowledge graphs. This review explains how machine learning and graph neural networks can be used to characterize molecular interactions systematically, predict targets that are of disease relevance, as well as priorities on multi-target intervention strategies. Generative models and reinforcement-based learning strategies are addressed to create compounds and combinations of drugs designed to modulate networks, and not individual protein inhibition. It describes the experimental validation processes, such as CETSA, NanoBRET, and Perturb-seq, and patient-derived models and MIDD systems to aid the translational evidence. Data quality, bias, interpretability, and reproducibility are taken into consideration. In sum, this review presents a feasible and combined model of AI-assisted network-mediated drug discovery.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.