Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42086798›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2026

Development and validation of an AI-generated real-world object stimuli set.

Gerard Campbell, Graeme Nicholls, Rebecca Hart, Richard J Allen, Claudia C von Bastian, Melanie R Burke, Mario Parra Rodriguez, Louise A Brown Nicholls

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gerard CampbellDepartment of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, 40 George St, Glasgow, G1 1QE, UK. gerard.campbell@strath.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-0186-1464
Graeme NichollsGraeme Nicholls Architects, Glasgow, UK.
Rebecca HartDepartment of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, 40 George St, Glasgow, G1 1QE, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-0399-8266
Richard J AllenSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1887-3016
Claudia C von BastianDepartment of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0667-2460
Melanie R BurkeSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2561-053X
Mario Parra RodriguezDepartment of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, 40 George St, Glasgow, G1 1QE, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2412-648X
Louise A Brown NichollsDepartment of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, 40 George St, Glasgow, G1 1QE, UK. l.nicholls@strath.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3520-6175

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The availability of real-world object stimuli that meet researchers' requirements is an ongoing challenge in visual cognition research. While numerous manually curated object stimulus sets exist, stimulus features such as size, color, and orientation tend to vary widely within a given set and may not be suitable for studies with specific requirements regarding these parameters. However, recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) can facilitate the generation of highly realistic, custom-made stimuli. Building on these developments, the present study aimed to share a set of 200 AI-generated images of everyday objects for research use. The objects were oriented as though 'placed' on a flat surface, such that they could be naturally embedded in virtual scenes. Moreover, they were created in greyscale and suitable for rendering in different colors. Here, we report the method used to efficiently generate the stimuli, as well as the results from a validation study in which we assessed the nameability, perceived realism and familiarity of the stimuli in a sample of 45 younger (18-35) and 45 older (65-85) adults. As anticipated, the majority of the stimuli were rated highly across all three measures, and no significant age differences were observed. The results thus validated most of the stimuli for future research. The stimuli, each in seven colors, and the corresponding validation scores are openly available for future use. Low-level image statistics of mean brightness and contrast for each image are also included in the dataset.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligencePhotic StimulationVisual PerceptionAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleRecognition, PsychologyYoung AdultAI image generationArtificial intelligenceReal-world object stimuliValidated stimuliVisual Cognition

Identifiers

PMID42086798
PMCPMC13144173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.