ArticleJournal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs2026
Anticoagulation optimization and clinical impact of post-transplant deep vein thrombosis: clinical impact and a VV-ECMO subgroup analysis.
Article in Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Post-transplant deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is common after lung transplantation and may contribute to pulmonary embolism and other complications. Whether DVT adversely affects contemporary outcomes and how venovenous ECMO (VV-ECMO) bridging influences early DVT patterns remain unclear. We performed a retrospective single-center study of adult lung transplant recipients (2018-2025). DVT and clinical outcomes were ascertained. Primary analyses compared outcomes and overall survival between recipients with and without DVT in the overall cohort. Secondary analyses assessed DVT-free survival and early anatomic distribution among recipients bridged with preoperative VV-ECMO. Comparisons used Fisher's exact/Mann-Whitney U tests; survival used Kaplan-Meier/log-rank tests. Among 502 recipients, 240 developed DVT. Compared with those without DVT, recipients with DVT had higher rates of pulmonary embolism (22.5% vs. 5.0%, p < 0.0001), acute kidney injury (52.9% vs. 41.2%, p = 0.009), PGD grade 3 (18.3% vs. 10.7%, p = 0.016), longer hospitalization (21 vs. 14 days, p < 0.001), and worse overall survival (HR 2.19, 95% CI 1.49-3.23; log-rank p < 0.001). Of 240 DVT cases, 31 (12.9%) were bridged with VV-ECMO. Within 14 days, upper-extremity DVT was more frequent with VV-ECMO (53.3% vs. 23.5%, p = 0.03), whereas lower-extremity and neck distributions were similar. In multivariable models, operative time was independently associated with DVT (OR 1.18 per hour, 95% CI 1.07-1.31, p < 0.001). Post-transplant DVT is frequent and portends worse outcomes. VV-ECMO bridging is associated with an upper-extremity-predominant DVT pattern but is not an independent DVT predictor after adjustment. Vigilant surveillance is warranted in this high-risk population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.