ArticleScientific reports2026
Urban-scale facade material mapping from street view images using vision-language models for circular construction planning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The lack of reliable building-level data remains an obstacle for advancing urban sustainability and circular economy practices. Here, we present URBAN-AI, a workflow that employs multimodal artificial intelligence to infer building material and facade characteristics from street-level imagery. We apply the workflow across six cities spanning high-income to low-income contexts (Zurich, San Francisco, Melbourne, Mumbai, Cape Town, and Rio de Janeiro), analysing and verifying outputs for 9,056 high confidence images, and achieving a mean composite module accuracy of 87.7% across all cities; to our knowledge, this represents the first cross-city evaluation of facade material classification using vision-language models. In all contexts, and especially in low-income and data-scarce settings, the workflow provides basic building information such as typology, material type, condition, and architectural style. The workflow also generates image-based indicators to inform downstream applications, including historical facade visual proxies, seismic retrofit visual proxies, energy retrofit visual proxies, urban morphology indicators, facade greening suitability visual proxies, and flood exposure visual proxies, to complement domain-specific models. We evaluate the approach in terms of accuracy, coverage, and cost efficiency, and contextualise results against conventional methods such as manual surveys. The study contributes two open resources: the Global Building Facade Dataset and the URBAN-AI workflow. These findings demonstrate the potential of AI-based workflows to support future efforts in circular construction, resource planning, and urban sustainability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.