ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
Deep learning model development and clinical validation for radiographic surrogate markers of implant esthetic risk.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reliable risk assessment for implant-supported restorations in the esthetic zone is critical yet challenging due to complex anatomical variations and the inherent subjectivity of traditional clinical assessments. To address these limitations, we developed a multi-functional artificial intelligence (AI) system designed to automate the assessment of radiographic surrogate markers of implant esthetic risk, specifically periapical inflammation (INFLAM), adjacent tooth restorations (RESTOR), and the distance between the contact point and alveolar crest (DISTAN) from periapical radiographs. The system underwent rigorous validation through a four-pronged strategy: direct performance comparison against dentists of varying experience, a human-AI collaboration scenario, exploratory prospective clinical testing and multi-site validation. Results demonstrated that the AI matched junior dentists in INFLAM/RESTOR tasks while statistically outperforming experts in the DISTAN task. Crucially, human-AI integration revealed a task-specific synergistic effect, particularly in DISTAN assessments, where it significantly enhanced recall compared to isolated performance. Furthermore, an exploratory prospective clinical testing and multi-site validation demonstrated the system's consistent performance and acceptable generalization ability, achieving high specificity across diverse clinical settings. This versatile AI tool facilitates the precise, objective assessment of radiographic surrogate markers strongly associated with esthetic risk. Although direct clinical esthetic outcomes were not prospectively measured, the system's proven ability to enhance dentist performance highlights its promising potential for pre-implant evaluation and clinical decision support.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.