ArticleScientific reports2026
The influence of skin physicochemical properties on electrical sensory sensitivity during transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in women.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation is a noninvasive pain-relief method whose efficacy depends on several application parameters. Skin-related factors may influence stimulation efficacy. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of selected physicochemical properties of the skin on the perception threshold of electrical stimuli. The superficial sensory threshold was measured on the forearm in 71 female students aged 19-25 years (Fitzpatrick skin phototypes I-III). Skin thickness and density, epidermal thickness, stratum corneum hydration, melanin and hemoglobin content, skin elasticity, and skin reflectance were assessed. Skin thickness, density, and epidermal thickness were not associated with electrical sensory threshold (EST). A higher melanin content in the skin was associated with a higher EST (R = 0.28, p < 0.05). Higher values of the R6 parameter in cutometric measurements were associated with lower sensory EST (R=-0.31, p < 0.01). No other cutometric parameters were associated with EST. Greater reflectance of electromagnetic radiation in the wavelength ranges of 700-1100 nm (R = 0.37, p < 0.01) and 1000-1700 nm (R = 0.37, p < 0.05) was associated with a higher EST. Dermal hydration is the primary determinant of the electrical sensory threshold. High reflectance in the wavelength ranges of 700-1100 nm and 1000-1700 nm indicates low dermal hydration, which reduces electrical conductivity and leads to an increased sensory threshold. A higher sensory threshold was associated with darker skin pigmentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.