Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42086685›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

The effect of modifying grinding aids with PCE on grinding efficiency and powder flowability.

Yahya Kaya, Veysel Kobya, Ali Mardani, Kambiz Ramyar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yahya KayaDepartment of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Bursa Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey.
Veysel KobyaDepartment of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Bursa Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey.
Ali MardaniDepartment of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Bursa Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey. ali.mardani16@gmail.com.
Kambiz RamyarDepartment of Civil Engineering, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.

Funding

Bursa Uludağ University Scientific Research Projects Unit (BAP) FBG-2025-2550
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cement grinding is an energy-intensive process, and while grinding aids (GAs) are common, research into hybrid systems combining different chemical mechanisms remains limited. This study evaluates the efficiency of hybrid GAs formulated by blending polycarboxylate ether (PCE) with traditional alkanolamines-triisopropanolamine (TIPA) and diethanolisopropanolamine (DEIPA)-and diethylene glycol (DEG). These formulations were tested against pure admixtures during the laboratory-scale ball milling of CEM I 42.5R cement at dosages of 0.05% and 0.1%. Results indicate that hybrid admixtures significantly outperform pure systems in reducing energy consumption. The P-DEIPA (PCE and DEIPA blend) emerged as the most efficient, achieving up to 14.4% energy savings compared to the control. Particle size distribution analysis suggests a synergistic effect: PCE prevents agglomeration while alkanolamines enhance fine-particle production, resulting in a high fraction (76.4%) of particles in the 0-32 μm range for P-DEIPA. Flowability indices-including the Carr index and angle of repose-showed improved powder characteristics across all treated samples, with the P-TIPA hybrid showing the most significant enhancement. Regarding mechanical performance, while pure TIPA yielded the highest compressive strengths (40.5 MPa at early age; 52.0 MPa at late age), the strength development of hybrid systems was influenced by a complex balance of physical refinement and hydration chemistry. These findings highlight the potential of hybrid formulations to optimize both grinding efficiency and cement performance.

Indexed as

Grinding aidGrinding efficiencyHybrid admixtureParticle size distributionPolycarboxylate etherPowder fluidity

Identifiers

PMID42086685
PMCPMC13333852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.