ArticleScientific reports2026
Background and oncological impact of intraoperative joint fluid leakage during extra-articular osteosarcoma resection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In case of sarcomas with intra-articular extension, extra-articular resection (EAR) provides good local control. However, during EAR, the joint capsule may be injured by error, causing tumoral joint fluid leakage, but its impact on oncological outcomes is still unrevealed. We here call these procedures as 'inadequate EAR' and retrospectively investigated the impact in 36 osteosarcoma patients. The affected joints included the knee (27 cases), hip (5), shoulder (3), and wrist (1). Responses of preoperative chemotherapy as 'controlled' or 'progressive' and surgical margins were also assessed. Among the patients, nine (25%) had inadequate EAR. Responses of preoperative chemotherapy were controlled in 23 cases and progressive in 13 cases. Surgical margins were wide in 31 cases and marginal in 5. The 5-year local control rates were 95.5% and 75% for adequate and inadequate EAR, respectively (p = 0.0488). The inadequate EAR group showed a significantly worse response rate of chemotherapy (p = 0.0459) and a trend towards insufficient surgical margins (p = 0.0876). Cox regression analysis indicated that inadequate EAR was associated with a higher hazard ratio (HR) of 6.81 (p = 0.13), whereas the HR for surgical margins was 1.56 (p = 0.74). Poor response to preoperative chemotherapy increases the likelihood of inadequate EAR and may compromise local control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.