ArticleScientific reports2026
A two-stage generative-AI fusion intrusion detection system for calibrated and reliable cloud security.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid expansion of cloud computing has significantly increased the scale, sophistication, and frequency of cyber threats, making reliable intrusion detection essential for secure cloud environments. However, conventional single-stage intrusion detection systems exhibit high false-positive rates, poor probability calibration, and degraded performance under severe class imbalance, thereby limiting their real-world deployment. This paper proposes a novel two-stage Generative-AI fusion intrusion detection model that integrates discriminative and generative learning to enhance predictive reliability and decision confidence. In the first stage, a binary classifier combining a Feature-Token Transformer and a Variational Autoencoder differentiates normal from malicious traffic using class-balanced focal loss and a precision-oriented routing threshold to minimize false alarms while preserving detection sensitivity. In the second stage, detected attack samples are forwarded to a conditional multi-class classifier for fine-grained attack categorization, incorporating SMOTE-based rebalancing, class-balanced focal loss, and class-specific threshold optimization to improve minority-class detection. The post-hoc temperature scaling is applied at both stages to produce well-calibrated probability estimates and support risk-aware decision-making. The performance of the proposed model measured on the UNSW-NB15 and NSL-KDD benchmark datasets indicate that proposed model performed well as compared to the single-stage Generative-AI fusion and evolutionary feature-selection baselines model and obtained the accuracy score of 94.03% and 77.07%, respectively to delivered the improved calibration and reduced false-alarm, and provide the robust and deployment-ready solution for modern cloud security.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.