ArticleNPJ precision oncology2026
Survival outcomes with matched targeted therapy in advanced biliary tract cancer: a large global cohort analysis.
Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prognosis of advanced biliary tract cancer remains poor despite up to 40% of tumors harboring actionable molecular alterations. This international collaborative study from Mayo Clinic, Duke Cancer Institute, National Cancer Center East (Japan), and the SCRUM-Japan GOZILA/MONSTAR-SCREEN projects evaluated clinical outcomes in 1049 patients with advanced BTC based on tumor molecular profiling and matched treatment selection. Patients were categorized into non-actionable, actionable with matched targeted therapy (matched), and actionable without matched therapy (unmatched) groups. Among 358 patients (34.1%) with actionable alterations, 160 (44.7%) received matched therapy. The matched group demonstrated significantly longer median overall survival (23.3 months; 95% CI: 19.5-30.4) compared to unmatched (14.7 months; 95% CI: 12.8-17.9) and non-actionable groups (17.1 months; 95% CI: 15.5-18.7; HR 0.57, 95% CI: 0.46-0.71; p 0.0001). In 700 patients receiving ≥2 lines of therapy, matched therapy remained independently associated with improved survival (HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.43-0.90). Notably, patients with actionable tumors who did not receive matched therapy experienced worse outcomes than those with non-actionable disease. These findings highlight the critical need for universal molecular profiling and equitable access to targeted therapies in advanced BTC.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.