Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42086659›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Detection of internet of things network attacks by hybrid deep learning (CNN-LSTM) algorithm to enhance security.

Salahaldeen Duraibi, Abdullah Mujawib Alashjaee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Salahaldeen DuraibiDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, College of Engineering and Computer Science, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia. sduraibi@jazanu.edu.sa.
Abdullah Mujawib AlashjaeeDepartment of Computer Science, College of Science, Northern Border University, Arar, Saudi Arabia, 73213.

Funding

Deanship of Graduate Studies and Scientific Research RG24-S0156
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The quick expansion of Internet of Things (IoT) devices has presented new cybersecurity challenges, with botnet attacks posing noteworthy threats to network stability and data integrity. This research presents a hybrid deep learning model that combines Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) also Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks to detect botnet attacks. This proposed model is trained and evaluated on the publicly available BoT-IoT dataset, which includes multiple attack types and realistic traffic patterns. To improve performance, Feature Engineering (FE) is used to reduce noise, and SMOTE is applied to address class imbalance in this proposed work. Experimental results are calculated with dataset which is balanced and unbalanced. Experimental results of the proposed model achieve high accuracy 99.77%, PR-AUC of 100%, and a ROC-AUC of 99.99% on the balanced dataset (D2). Compared to traditional deep learning models, the proposed hybrid model demonstrates better feature representation and temporal pattern recognition, which significantly improves attack classification in IoT scenarios. Compared to traditional deep learning models, the proposed hybrid model demonstrates better feature representation and temporal pattern recognition, which significantly improves attack classification in IoT scenarios. The model also performs on imbalanced data, demonstrating its generalizability. The proposed CNN-LSTM hybrid outperforms classical and deep learning baselines, offering a scalable and interpretable approach.

Indexed as

BoT-IoT datasetConvolutional Neural Network (CNN)CyberattacksDistributed denial of service (DDoS)Internet of Things (IoT)

Identifiers

PMID42086659
PMCPMC13333915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.