ArticleScientific reports2026
An archaeo-metabolomics approach for identifying cedar tar in archaeological samples: differentiating plant products and production processes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The human ability to create manufactured substances is not a modern innovation. It began in the Middle Palaeolithic with the production of birch tar through dry distillation, a process of heating bark under low-oxygen conditions. Over time, this technological knowledge extended to other materials and purposes. Among these, cedar products became especially significant, valued in medicine, technology, cosmetics, and mummification. Yet, distinguishing cedar tar from other cedar products, such as resin or essential oil, has long challenged archaeological science due to their closely related chemical composition. Here we used a GC-MS-based metabolomics approach to identify chemical markers of cedar tar samples. Using modern Cedrus atlantica samples, we defined a set of diagnostic compounds (i.e. dihydro-ar-turmerone, cuparene, dihydrocurcumene, ar-himachalene and 1-methyl-3,5-diisopropylbenzene) that reveal both the cedar origin and the transformative process of dry distillation. As a proof of concept, these chemical markers were searched for and successfully detected in ancient Egyptian mummification balms (664-332 BCE), providing direct evidence for cedar tar use in embalming mixtures and new insights into ancient technologies and cultural practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.