Observational studyScientific reports2026
Predictive scoring system for independent walking disability after fragility hip fracture surgery: a multicenter study.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Loss of walking ability after hip fracture in older adults is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. To address this, we developed and internally validated a predictive scoring system to estimate the risk of independent walking disability at three months postoperatively. This multicenter retrospective cohort study included 740 patients aged 60 years or older who underwent surgery for fragility hip fracture. Twelve clinically relevant predictors were initially assessed, and multivariable logistic regression with backward elimination identified nine variables for the final model. A point-based scoring system (total score range 0-16) was constructed and validated using 500 bootstrap resamples. At three months, 113 patients (15.3%) were unable to walk independently, while 627 (84.7%) regained independent ambulation. The model demonstrated good discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AuROC) of 0.81) and good calibration (calibration slope of 1.008; calibration-in-the-large (CITL) of -0.002). Based on calibration performance and score distribution, patients were stratified into three risk categories: low risk (score 0-5), moderate risk (score 6-14), and high risk (score 15-16), with positive predictive values for walking disability of 1.8%, 19.1%, and 60.0%, respectively. Mean total scores differed significantly between groups (11.7 ± 3.0 vs. 7.2 ± 3.9, p < 0.001). This scoring system provides a practical tool for postoperative risk stratification prior to hospital discharge, facilitating discharge planning and individualized rehabilitation strategies. It may be particularly useful for identifying high-risk patients who could benefit from tailored post-discharge rehabilitation programs in the home setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.