ArticleScientific reports2026
Sustainable valorization of waste polystyrene and PVC blends for high-performance applications.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Disposal of solid plastic waste is one of the major challenges facing most countries, especially developing countries. In this study, waste polystyrene foam (WPS) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) from waste plastic bottles were recycled. The waste PET was chemically recycled using a glycolysis technique to obtain the glycolyzed product (GPET) and subsequently unsaturated polyester. WPS was also mechanically recycled using a hot blending technique. Polyvinyl chloride, GPET, and the prepared polyester were added as multifunctional additives and their effects were compared with conventional additives such as dioctyl phthalate (DOP). The effect of these additives on the rheological, mechanical, and electrical properties was studied. Thermal stability, fire retardancy and morphology of the WPS/PVC blends were also evaluated. Results showed that polyester significantly improved melt flow rate (up to 0.975 g/10 min), flame retardancy (burning rate reduced to ~ 0.5 mm/s), and decreased combustion energy (~ 404 cal). GPET enhanced tensile strength (21.96 MPa) and elongation at break (37%). Additives increased permittivity and conductivity, while polyester exhibited the strongest dielectric response due to enhanced interfacial polarization. SEM analysis confirmed better dispersion and compatibility in GPET and polyester blends. Based on the results, the developed blend shows strong potential for use in applications requiring enhanced mechanical, thermal stability, and flame retardancy as electrical insulation, construction materials, and automotive components.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.