ArticleNPJ breast cancer2026
Co-occurring rare germline DNA repair gene variants in BRCA1/BRCA2 implicated hereditary breast cancer families.
Article in NPJ breast cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As gene-panels expand to include candidate breast cancer predisposing genes (CPGs) involved in diverse DNA repair pathways, we investigated an index breast cancer (BC) case from 56 BRCA1/BRCA2 implicated high-risk hereditary BC families using gene-based approach for co-occurring, rare germline variants predicted to be damaging and clinically relevant in 276 DNA repair genes (DRGs). Using whole exome sequencing analyses, we identified a total of 287 variants in 55% of DRGs, of which 24 loss-of-function and 36 other predicted damaging variants were identified in 72% and 76% of BRCA1 and BRCA2 implicated cases, respectively. We also identified 60 variants of clinical interest in various known CPGs, including those involved in risk to other cancers, in 72% of BRCA1 and 60% of BRCA2 cases. The number of variants predicted to be deleterious in diverse DRGs raises questions about the interpretability of findings as panel testing expands beyond clinically established breast CPGs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.