ArticleNature communications2026
Quantifying and categorising the animal welfare impacts caused by biological invasions.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Quantifying and categorising the animal welfare impacts caused by biological invasions.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biological invasions cause animal suffering, but few studies assess these welfare impacts, and hence understanding of them is limited. We present a framework which can be used to identify relative changes to the welfare of an individual animal caused by biological invasions. We use it to assess the welfare impacts of bird and ant invasions. These impacts are a global phenomenon affecting native and introduced animals. Nevertheless, some introduced ant species cause severe impacts wherever they occur, whereas introduced birds do not. Impacts are likely to be underreported, particularly those affecting introduced animals. Physical and behavioural evidence (e.g., injuries and repetitive preening by birds) is sufficient to identify many welfare impacts. Physiological evidence (e.g., changes in 'stress' hormones) is more scarce, and could provide useful additional information to help quantify impact severity. Published biodiversity impacts of biological invasions are an unmined resource that may be used to assess impacts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.