Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42086481›Full record

ArticleBiostatistics (Oxford, England)2026

A sensitivity analysis approach to principal stratification with a continuous longitudinal intermediate outcome: applications to a cohort stepped wedge trial.

Lei Yang, Michael J Daniels, Fan Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biostatistics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lei YangDepartment of Statistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Michael J DanielsDepartment of Statistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9856-9486
Fan LiDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6183-1893

Funding

Bayesian machine learning for complex missing data and causal inference with a focus on cardiovascular and obesity studiesR01HL166324 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI Michael J Daniels · 2023 to 2026
$2.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL166324
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Causal inference in the presence of intermediate variables is a challenging problem in many applications. Principal stratification (PS) provides a framework to estimate principal causal effects (PCE) in such settings. However, existing PS methods primarily focus on settings with binary intermediate variables. We propose a novel approach to estimate PCE with continuous intermediate variables in the context of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials (SW-CRTs). Our method leverages the time-varying treatment assignment in SW-CRTs to calibrate sensitivity parameters and identify the PCE under realistic assumptions. We demonstrate the application of our approach using data from a cohort SW-CRT evaluating the effect of a crowdsourcing intervention on HIV testing uptake among men who have sex with men in China, with social norms as a continuous intermediate variable. The proposed methodology expands the scope of PS to accommodate continuous variables and provides a practical tool for causal inference in SW-CRTs.

Indexed as

Cohort StudiesData Interpretation, StatisticalRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBiostatisticsChinaCrowdsourcingHIV InfectionsHomosexuality, MaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleModels, StatisticalSensitivity and SpecificityStatistics as Topiccausal inferencecluster randomized trialHIV testing and preventionprincipal causal effectsensitivity analysisstepped wedge design

Identifiers

PMID42086481
PMCPMC13143403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.