ArticleMedical physics2026
Prediction of VMAT gamma passing rates using 3D CNNs based on leaf position analysis and gradient class activation mapping for plan complexity evaluation.
Article in Medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVolumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) is a highly conformal radiotherapy technique that enables precise tumor irradiation while sparing surrounding healthy tissue. However, the high technical demands this technique places on Linear Accelerators (LinAc) necessitate reliable quality assurance (QA) tools. The Gamma Passing Rate (GPR), commonly used to compare planned and delivered dose distributions, requires extensive measurement resources. Many existing predictive metrics, such as the popular Modulation Complexity Score (MCS), are independent of the beam model, limiting their accuracy. Consequently, identifying appropriate metrics and their individual thresholds can be challenging. PURPOSE: This study aims to predict the GPR of VMAT arcs using a three-dimensional convolutional neural network (3D CNN). Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) is applied to improve interpretability, identify weak segments, and potentially reveal beam model limitations.
methodsA 3D CNN was trained on 140 6 MV VMAT arcs, with 30 arcs each used for validation and testing. All plans were delivered by an Elekta Harmony Pro LinAc with 4° control point (CP) spacing. Input data included discretized beam's eye view (BEV) representations and segment-specific monitor unit (MU) values. GPR evaluation was performed using a Delta4+ phantom with a 1%/ 2 mm criterion. Data augmentation enhanced training diversity. Grad-CAM was used to visualize influential plan regions.
resultsAfter 36 epochs, the model achieved a mean absolute error (MAE) of 2.0%(test set) and 1.3%(training set). With cropped input, the best MAEs were 2.1%(test) and 1.5%(training). Grad-CAM analysis indicated that dynamic delivery aspects had more influence on prediction accuracy than static features like field shape.
conclusionsThis study highlights the potential of deep learning for automated GPR prediction, offering a more efficient QA workflow. Especially in time-critical settings like online adaptive radiotherapy, where traditional measurement-based QA is often impractical, this model provides a scalable solution to ensure treatment safety. The use of Grad-CAM enables insight into beam model and LinAc performance, allowing refinement of treatment planning and improved QA precision in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.