ArticleThe Canadian journal of urology2026
Transperineal approach for penetrating injury of corpus spongiosum and bulbous urethra caused by vesicourethral foreign body: a case report.
Article in The Canadian journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVesicourethral foreign bodies are frequently encountered in urological emergency departments; however, cases of penetrating injury to the corpus spongiosum penis and bulbous urethra are rare. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 64-year-old man presented with difficulty removing a foreign body that he had inserted into his urethra for masturbation. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) revealed a rod-shaped foreign body lodged from the bulbous urethra to the posterior wall of the bladder. Cystoscopy confirmed penetration of the foreign body into the urethral sponge at the bulbous urethra. An attempt was made to remove the foreign body transurethrally, but it was unsuccessful, leading to the establishment of a cystostomy and subsequent hospitalization. Under general anesthesia, the foreign object was removed through a perineal incision, revealing a bamboo skewer with an attached rubber tube. No postoperative complications were noted. Urethrography performed six months postoperatively showed no urethral stricture, and the patient established spontaneous urination without erectile or ejaculatory dysfunction.
conclusionsIn cases of penetrating urethral injury, where the wound is often sharp, perineal surgery should be considered on par with the transurethral approach, as it does not affect the patient's postoperative quality of life if infection complications are monitored carefully.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42086365What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.