ArticleThe Canadian journal of urology2026
Observations of high variability in DNA fragmentation of epididymal sperm in men.
Article in The Canadian journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesMen with obstructive azoospermia (OA) or infertility often require surgical sperm retrieval for assisted reproductive techniques. While sperm can be successfully obtained from either the testis or epididymis in these patients, sperm DNA integrity may differ between retrieval sites, which could influence reproductive outcomes. This study aimed to determine whether bilateral epididymal and/or testicular sperm extraction is necessary in men with OA or infertility and elevated DNA fragmentation index (DFI).
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed men who underwent bilateral testicular biopsy and/or microscopic epididymal sperm aspiration (MESA) by a single surgeon from 2020-2022. TUNEL assays were performed to assess DFI (normal ≤15%). The primary endpoint of the study was to evaluate the variability in DFI between the right and left testes/epididymis in men undergoing sperm extraction.
resultsIn total, 24 men met criteria to be included in this analysis who underwent sperm extraction with DFI analysis via MESA and/or testicular biopsy. Among patients with OA, testicular sperm demonstrated significantly lower DFI compared to epididymal sperm on both sides (right testis 9.52 vs. right epididymis 17.61, p = 0.01; left testis 9.22 vs. left epididymis 14.71, p = 0.04). For each individual patient with OA, the mean intra-patient difference in DFI between right and left epididymal sperm was significantly higher than the mean intra-patient difference in DFI between right and left testicular sperm (12.09% ± 6.58, compared to 2.27% ± 1.59, p < 0.001, respectively).
conclusionBilateral epididymal sperm extraction may be warranted in men with OA given the observed intra-patient variability in DNA fragmentation between epididymides. Conversely, bilateral testicular extraction may be unnecessary, as no significant difference in DNA fragmentation variability was observed between sperm retrieved from either testicle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42086360What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.