Observational studyThe Canadian journal of urology2026
Barriers to urologic care following spinal cord injury.
Observational study in The Canadian journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIndividuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) are at high risk for developing neurogenic bladder or neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD), which can lead to severe complications and negatively impact quality of life. Despite the critical need for timely urologic care, barriers to access remain poorly understood, particularly in resource-limited settings. This study aims to identify systemic and perceived barriers to urologic follow-up for individuals with SCI treated at an academic medical center.
methodsA single-center, observational study was conducted on individuals presenting with a diagnosis code indicative of complete SCI at an academic hospital between October 2015 and October 2023. Data were extracted from electronic medical records using ICD-10 codes for SCI, and phone interviews were conducted to assess symptoms, quality of life, and perceived barriers to care. Descriptive statistics summarized the findings. Univariate and multivariate Firth logistic regression analyses were performed to analyze for possible covariates impacting the odds of follow-up or having obtained a urodynamics study.
resultsOf 213 records, 136 met the inclusion criteria. Among them, only 17 (13%) received a urology consultation during their hospital stay, and 28 (21%) had been seen in a urology clinic post-injury. Phone interviews with 42 patients revealed that 93% reported NLUTD symptoms, with a mean quality of life impact score of 7.3. Barriers identified included availability (71%), accessibility (45%), accommodation (69%), affordability (43%), and acceptability (31%) barriers. Firth logistic regression demonstrated that male sex was associated with lower odds (OR = 0.205, 95% CI: 0.048, 0.772, p = 0.02) of having obtained a urodynamics study.
conclusionSignificant gaps in urologic care for individuals with SCI exist. Statistically significant variation in management via Firth logistic regression analyses also demonstrates potential disparities in follow-up and management. Addressing these challenges requires improved discharge planning, increased healthcare accessibility, and innovative care models such as telemedicine. Future research should explore broader geographic regions and interventions to improve outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42086359What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.