Trial reportThe Canadian journal of urology2026
Flexible ureterorenoscopy vs. mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney stones in chronic kidney damage: a prospective study.
Trial report in The Canadian journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesChronic kidney disease (CKD) poses unique challenges in the management of renal stones, and high-quality evidence to guide treatment decisions is limited. This study aimed to compare the effects of flexible ureteroscopy (f-URS) and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (m-PCNL) on perioperative outcomes and long-term renal function in patients with CKD and renal stones.
methodsThis prospective randomized study included 60 CKD patients with renal stones measuring 1-4 cm. Participants were randomized into f-URS (n = 24) and m-PCNL (n = 36) groups. Baseline demographics, stone characteristics, and perioperative parameters were recorded. Stone-free rate (SFR) was defined as the absence of any residual fragments on postoperative computed tomography (CT) at 1 month. Renal function was assessed by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), serum creatinine, and CKD stage at baseline and 6 months. A post hoc exploratory subgroup analysis was performed for patients with 10-20 mm stones.
resultsStone-free rates were comparable between groups (79.2% vs. 86.1%, p > 0.05). f-URS was associated with shorter operative duration, reduced fluoroscopy time, lower hemoglobin drop, and shorter hospital stay (all p < 0.01). At 6 months, median renal function values were more favorable in the f-URS group, with higher median eGFR (44.0 vs. 51.5 mL/min, p = 0.042) and lower creatinine (1.6 vs. 1.4 mg/dL, p = 0.031), whereas the changes from baseline (ΔeGFR and Δcreatinine) did not show a statistically significant difference. In the exploratory 10-20 mm subgroup results were statistically in favor of f-URS, but these findings should not be generalized due to the small sample size and post hoc nature of the analysis.
conclusionsBoth f-URS and m-PCNL achieved similar stone clearance in CKD patients. f-URS may offer advantages regarding perioperative safety and renal function preservation, but these observations require confirmation in larger studies with long-term follow-up. Treatment decisions in this high-risk population should be individualized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42086348What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.