Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42086298›Full record

SynthesisBMJ global health2026

A systematic review of infectious disease outbreaks and violence against women and girls: changes in magnitude, mechanisms and lessons for the future.

Lindsay Stark, Douglas James Noble, Melissa Meinhart, Blake Erhardt-Ohren, Sarah Karmin, Catherine Poulton, Danielle Sarraf, Flavia Bustreo, Ilana Seff

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lindsay StarkWashington University in St Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA lindsaystark@wustl.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8775-9735
Douglas James NobleUNICEF, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-2335-5367
Melissa MeinhartWashington University in St Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Blake Erhardt-OhrenUniversity of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.
Sarah KarminUNICEF, New York, New York, USA.
Catherine PoultonUNICEF, New York, New York, USA.
Danielle SarrafWashington University in St Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Flavia BustreoFondation Botnar, Basel, Switzerland.
Ilana SeffWashington University in St Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infectious disease outbreaks (outbreaks) are increasing across the globe due to climate change, urbanisation and changes in land use, and many of their response measures impact risk factors for violence against women and girls (VAWG). We conducted a systematic review to consolidate existing evidence on the impact of any outbreaks, and their public health responses, on the change in magnitude of VAWG and mechanisms facilitating violence among women and girls in low-income and middle-income countries. Though our search strategy aimed to capture studies from any outbreak since 2014, all quantitative evidence on VAWG impacts, and all but one qualitative study, focused on the COVID-19 pandemic, and only three studies disaggregated outcomes for women versus girls. Overall, our synthesis of the evidence points to increased VAWG during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic compared with pre-pandemic levels. We identified five broad mechanisms through which violence occurred against women and girls: (1) income loss due to economic shutdown, financial insecurity, and/or job loss, (2) movement restrictions, (3) changes in access to public services, (4) fear of exposure to infectious disease, and (5) a legacy of mistrust in health systems from previous outbreaks. Our study demonstrates the novelty of VAWG monitoring during outbreaks, the need for increased surveillance and the known mechanisms to date through which VAWG may be perpetrated during outbreaks. By implementing both short-term protective measures and long-term structural reforms, outbreak responses may not only break the cycle of VAWG exacerbated by public health emergencies but build resilient systems that protect women, girls and marginalised populations before, during and after crises.

Indexed as

Disease OutbreaksGender-Based ViolenceViolenceCOVID-19FemaleHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2COVID-19Disease OutbreaksGender-Based ViolenceReviewViolence

Identifiers

PMID42086298
PMCPMC13150909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.