Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42086294›Full record

ArticleBMJ open gastroenterology2026

Effectiveness and safety of mirikizumab in ulcerative colitis: real-world data from the Latium Net.

Marco Murgiano, Paola Balestrieri, Emma Calabrese, Gionata Fiorino, Stefano Festa, Daniela Pugliese, Federica Di Vincenzo, Pierluigi Puca, Simone Parello, Valeria Vespasiano and 11 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Marco MurgianoDipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-5578-0854
Paola BalestrieriGastroenterology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.
Emma CalabreseGastroenterology Unit, Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2177-0421
Gionata FiorinoIBD Unit, Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Stefano FestaDepartment of Gastroenterology, San Filippo Neri Hospital, ASL Roma 1, Rome, Italy.
Daniela PuglieseDipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Federica Di VincenzoDipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy federica.divincenzo30@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5347-7641
Pierluigi PucaDipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Simone ParelloDipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Valeria VespasianoGastroenterology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.
Alice ColellaGastroenterology Unit, Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Irene MarafiniGastroenterology Unit, Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Francesca ProfetaDipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Elisa FoscariniDipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Alfredo PapaDipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Loris Riccardo LopetusoIBD Unit, Centro Malattie dell'Apparato Digerente (CEMAD), UOC Medicina Interna e Gastroenterologia, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Giovanni MonteleoneGastroenterology Unit, Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Michele CicalaGastroenterology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.
Antonio GasbarriniDipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Lucrezia LaterzaDipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Franco ScaldaferriDipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness and safety of mirikizumab in patients with ulcerative colitis in clinical practice.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective, multicenter cohort study across five Italian inflammatory bowel disease centers. Patients initiating mirikizumab between November 2024 and May 2025 were included. The primary endpoint was steroid-free clinical remission (SFCR) at 12 weeks, defined as the absence of rectal bleeding and near-normal stool frequency without corticosteroids. Secondary outcomes included clinical response (≥30% improvement in stool frequency and rectal bleeding), biochemical response (normalisation of fecal calprotectin (FCP) and C-reactive protein (CRP)), and safety (any adverse events). Follow-up at 24 weeks was assessed when available. Subgroup analyses were performed according to prior exposure to biologics (including ustekinumab) and induction regimen.

resultsA total of 95 patients were included (mean age 49.9±16.9 years; 50.5% male); 12.6% were biologic naïve and 17 (17.9%) received extended induction. At week 12, 43.2% of patients (41/95) achieved SFCR, 61.1% (58/95) clinical response, and 32/95 (33.7%) biochemical remission. SFCR rates were similar between biologic-naïve and biologic-experienced patients (42.6% vs 43.8%, p=0.906). SFCR rates were 36.2% and 88.2% in patients receiving extended and standard induction, respectively (p=0.002). At week 24, prior ustekinumab exposure was associated with numerically lower SFCR, although this difference was not statistically significant (38.5% vs 73.7%; OR=0.22, 95% CI 0.05 to 1.01, p=0.052). Changes in biomarkers were not statistically significant at week 12 (CRP Δ-0.08 mg/dL, p=0.464; FCP Δ-249 µg/g, p=0.127). Three patients discontinued treatment due to lack of efficacy. No adverse events were observed.

conclusionMirikizumab demonstrated meaningful clinical effectiveness and a favourable safety profile in a real-world setting, including in biologic-experienced patients.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAnti-Ulcer AgentsColitis, UlcerativeAdultAgedFemaleHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedRemission InductionRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAnti-Ulcer AgentsmirikizumabINTERLEUKINSSTEROID-SPARING EFFICACYTreatment OutcomeULCERATIVE COLITIS

Identifiers

PMID42086294
PMCPMC13150890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.