ArticleBMJ open2026
Coping strategies and associated factors in a sample of Iranian nurses: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate coping strategies and associated factors among clinical nurses in Iran in 2023.
designCross-sectional study.
settingHospitals in Kashan, Iran.
participantsA total of 400 nurses were selected through stratified random sampling from different hospital departments. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Coping strategies were measured via the Potential Factors Related to Coping Strategies Questionnaire, the Work-Family Conflict Scale and the Ways of Coping Questionnaire. Coping strategies were quantified with scores ranging from 0 to 198. Associations with potential influencing factors were assessed.
resultsThe coping strategies score was 94.22±25.49 (95% CLM 91.72 to 96.72). Notably, 83.5% of the variation in coping strategy scores could be attributed to emotion-focused coping. The simultaneous inclusion of work-family conflict and spouse participation in household affairs was found to be significant (F=9.85, p<0.0001). Work-family conflict was positively associated (B=0.82, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.26), whereas spouse participation was negatively associated (B=-8.43, 95% CI -16.22 to -0.64). Together, these variables accounted for 6.4% of the variance in coping strategies.
conclusionsNurses in Kashan hospitals used moderate levels of coping strategies, which were mainly emotion-focused. It is recommended that hospitals provide guidance on these strategies, especially during pandemic crises.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.