ArticleBMJ open2026
Comparing the Asia-Pacific Colorectal Screening and adjusted Asia-Pacific Colorectal Screening scores for risk stratification of advanced colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic Vietnamese: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe Asia-Pacific Colorectal Screening (APCS) score is a validated tool for predicting advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACN) in the Asia-Pacific region. An adjusted APCS (A-APCS) score was recently developed by incorporating body mass index into the original score and was reported to outperform the original score but lacked external validation. This study aimed to compare the A-APCS score with the original APCS score in asymptomatic Vietnamese individuals.
designA cross-sectional study.
settingDai Phuoc Polyclinic, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
participantsAsymptomatic individuals underwent colonoscopy screening. OUTCOME MEASURES: Participants were categorised into three risk groups based on the sum of the APCS and A-APCS scores: average risk (AR), moderate risk (MR) and high risk (HR). The performance of the two scores was compared via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and McNemar tests.
resultsA total of 714 participants (median age 51 years, range: 18-79; female-to-male ratio: 1:1.46) were included, with an ACN prevalence of 9.0%. Both scores indicated effective predictive ability for ACN in the HR group compared with the AR group, with OR=3.878 (95% CI 1.777 to 8.068) and 3.266 (95% CI 1.617 to 6.595), respectively. The A-APCS score was more effective than the APCS score in predicting ACN in the MR group than in the AR group. However, no significant differences in area under the ROC curve were observed between the two scores for ACN prediction.
conclusionsCompared with the APCS score, the A-APCS score may not provide improved ACN risk stratification in asymptomatic Vietnamese individuals. Both scores are suboptimal and should be used to prioritise, rather than exclude, candidates for colonoscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.